Shasta County D.A. candidates asked about real meaning of 2nd Amendment
By Nathan Zeliff, Esq.
There is a newly released update on the Katrina Gun
Confiscations, which you may not know about. Recently, May 2010, it has
surfaced that there was at least ½ of a National Guard Company (during
Katrina) who advised their commanding officers that if they were given orders
to disarm citizens, they would refuse to follow such orders because they
So I ask you, if there were a massive disaster or civil
unrest in Shasta County, man-made or otherwise, what would our governmental
officials do? Have you asked your elected officials and those running for
office what they would do if a state of “emergency” were declared in
Shasta county? Well, it’s election time, and this is a very good time to
find out. We need to know whether elected officials will actually follow the
oath, which they will be swearing before God, to support and defend the U.S.
Constitution, which includes your American Bill of Rights!
I presented specific questions to various political
candidates, including those running for the Office of District Attorney for
Shasta County. Do you want to
know what they said?
First off, I didn’t ask the question “Do you support
the 2nd Amendment”? Why? Because in today’s politically correct
atmosphere any purported answer would be meaningless generalizations.
Therefore, I asked pointed and specific questions. I also requested
specific and direct answers.
Two of my questions (they are labeled “B” and
“C”) are set forth below, as well as the responses and lack of response.
Question B dealt with the Purpose of 2nd
Amendment and reads: “Do you recognize that the purpose of the
Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms is to protect all of the rest of your
American Bill of Rights (which are God given rights, pre-existing before
government), and to make certain that in the event governments become
tyrannical and oppressive, then, as a last resort, the entire population of
armed citizens can take back their liberties by force of arms?"
For this question, the candidates were asked to
specifically select from the following answer alternatives:
“Yes, I recognize both purposes”, or
“No, I don’t recognize both purposes”.
Jerry Benito’s Response to the question on the Purpose of the 2nd Amendment was: “Yes, I recognize both purposes. However, I believe historically the Individual Right to Bear Arms was grounded in the concept of "self-defense". Theoretically, question B's statements and the concept of “self-defense" could be viewed as consistent.”
Comment: Mr. Benito’s response shows that he took the time to think about the question, and also he provided a direct response.
Response to the question on the Purpose of the 2nd Amendment - non
Comment: Mr. Carlton
wouldn’t provide a direct response to the actual question. Although I
understood that a written response would be provided by Mr. Carlton, such was
not done. An earlier correspondence merely obtained a generalized statement from
Mr. Carlton that he believed in the “citizens’ rights to keep and bear arms
as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution....”
Question C dealt with Gun Confiscation and reads:
“If an order were given (by
any purported “authorized” civil or military authority, e.g., President,
Governor, or otherwise, due to some type of “emergency” or otherwise)
ordering that all firearms were to be confiscated from all residents of Shasta
County (exempting only law
enforcement and military), how would you advise local law enforcement (or any
other officials seeking your legal viewpoint and for which you have authority to
Again the candidates were
asked to specifically state their view as to such an order, selecting between
these two answer alternatives: “1.
Proceed to confiscate the firearms;” or “ 2. The order is unlawful and in
violation of the U. S. Constitution and you should refuse to obey it”.
Jerry Benito’s Response to the Gun Confiscation
question was: “Again, more facts are needed to answer properly. However, I
can't imagine a situation in which I could ever advise our law enforcement that
it is appropriate to confiscate firearms from all residents in Shasta County.
So, I would have to choose answer 2- that the order is unlawful and violates the
Comment: Again, Mr. Benito’s response shows that he took
the time to think about the question, and also he provided a direct response.
Stephen Carlton’s Response to the Gun Confiscation
question - non responsive:
submitting this article, I again called Mr. Carlton and advised him that I
desired his response to these specific questions for this article. When I
previously called Mr. Carlton, I understood that a written response would be
provided. During my last conversation, Mr. Carlton stated that he “believes in
the second amendment”, and words to the effect that the questions are not
really applicable to the position he is running for, and that really that was
all he had to say. Mr. Carlton had previously advised that he would not support
conduct he “knew to be unconstitutional”.
Mr. Carlton again didn’t provide a direct response to the
actual questions. His answers were evasive and non responsive. Further, if a
county public official (e.g., police etc…) violates your legal and
Constitutional rights, the District Attorney should be involved.
The viewpoints of the District Attorney are relevant. Although Mr.
Carlton advised he would not support conduct he “knew to be
unconstitutional”, he refused to answer the actual question as to whether
Katrina style gun confiscation would be unconstitutional. That was the point of
In Closing: I
will be honest with you, before conducting the above survey, I had read the
political ads. I had visited the candidate’s websites and I was actually
tending towards voting for Mr. Carlton. However,
after spending substantial time and effort on this matter, and to receive
boilerplate answers from Mr. Carlton, combined with his refusal to provide
direct and responsive answers to these questions, was shocking. The responses
only required that the applicable “box” be checked for your answer.
When people who want our vote will not give a straight answer to a very
clear question, then why would we vote for them?
I am now changing my vote to Jerry Benito.
Ask those running for office to answer your specific questions with specific answers. And remember to elect into office only those who will actually follow the Oath they will be taking before God, to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” They are to represent American citizens, and to follow the United States Constitution. That is their job.
Nathan Zeliff is an authorized instructor for Concealed Weapon Permit Courses in Shasta and Tehama Counties; and is a Certified NRA Instructor in the following disciplines: Pistol, Rifle, and Personal Protection in the Home.