Wildfires emphasize need to improve emergency alert systems – SFGate

This is not about firearms, but about emergency preparedness.

A SF Gate Articles advises that California Wildfires emphasize the need to improve emergency alert systems- article HERE.

At ShastaDefense.com a community emergency Ham Radio Plan has been designed by N. Zeliff. It has been published and being used locally – see details HERE.  Local operators assist in making improvements as we conduct drills and observe real world events.  The system was designed for the local community to use in cases of: Earthquakes, Wildfires, and Situation Reporting (snow storms, power outages, need firewood, need propane, need medical, etc…).  In our area, we have had snow storms, power outages that lasted a week, and had no land line or cell phone. So – who are you going to call?  When there is several feet of snow on the ground, the power is out, and you have no communications, the silence is deafening.

We have had the Ponderosa fire – it was difficult to obtain up to date information.  Moreover, during a  recent fire, I  set up and acted as a mobile Net Control near a fire (seven spot fires), as another radio operator reported into the net from a home base station with Calfire and other dispatches. Other mobile operators also provided reports.   Our communications were short, professional, informative and scheduled every 15 minutes during such an event. Non Ham radio operators listened and were able to learn in real time the status of the fires which were burning near their homes.

For local  participating stations, criteria for issuing an ALERT TONE are set forth. Any participating station operator can send the ALERT TONE on designated frequencies to activate an emergency net.   It will only work if citizens become involved.  We have the local STARC  radio club helping out along with other Ham Radio Operators. You don’t have to join anything.  Just turn on your radio (and leave it on 24/7), and follow the plan. If you are in Shasta County, California, please join in. If you are located elsewhere in the United States, why not set up a program for your area?  The smoke reporting program was designed from scratch.  It is NOT a substitute for 911.

The SF Gate article, illustrated the need for Citizens to take responsibility for their own well being. The article advised:

1. As massive wildfires spread across the North Bay area, Sonoma County officials decided against sending a mass text alert to residents’ cell phones. One concern was that the Officials didn’t want to cause unnecessary panic. In this regard, such may have been fatal for persons who couldn’t evacuate.

2. Other issues included:  “when the fire burns or the flood wipes out cell towers, if the lines go down, how do you notify people when every second counts? …

The reality is that in our mountain area, by the time 911 is called and response arrives, a forest fire could become very large.  Also, it is difficult to determine the source of smoke due to the shifting winds and hills.

With a network of Ham operators, a system has been designed for the purpose of seeking to triangulate on sources of potential smoke / fire using radio reports. It isn’t perfect, but it was used in my neighborhood to locate the source of smoke by smell, wind direction, mapping, etc… .

Thank you.

Nathan Zeliff

 

Active Response Training – Articles

Message body

 

 

 

 

December 7, 2017 status – email correspondence:

Message body

——-

To

Message body

Also, in follow up, your blog mailings were received by me (for which I have now unsubscribed).

Nathan Zeliff, Esq.

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: Nathan Zeliff <zlaw@taxsos.com>
To: Greg Ellifritz <greg1095@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: ShastaDefense

This is the ONLY e-mail I received from you.  I enter my e-mail account multiple times a day, and have new e-mails throughout the day (I send and receive).

I have still never received the e-mail advising me to take down the content. I had sent you a request for permission; however, my first response from you was  the”clown” comment on your facebook and the derogatory postings. As per my e-mail (below) I already removed the content.

Request is made that you please remove all the derogatory and comment strings from your facebook  account  (and any other sources). They are false. I will  then remove my response on my blog in order to move forward.

Please advise.

Thank you.

Nathan Zeliff, Esq.

From: Greg Ellifritz <greg1095@yahoo.com>
To: Nathan Zeliff <zlaw@taxsos.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: ShastaDefense

Nathan,

This will be the fourth email I sent to you from three different accounts.  The first two seemed to go through.

I got this error message on the third message.

This message was created automatically by the mail system (ecelerity).

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

>>> Zlaw@taxsos.com (while not connected): 554 5.4.7 [internal] exceeded max retries without delivery

You might want to check your email system.

I don’t know if this one will go through or not, but I’ll give it one more try.  I responded to your original query (3 times) asking you to remove my content.

Greg

From: Nathan Zeliff <zlaw@taxsos.com>
To: “greg1095@yahoo.com” <greg1095@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 1:38 AM
Subject: ShastaDefense

I had written you for permission for the posting. I believe this was done through your on line contact form.  As I recall, I had advised that if you didn’t agree, that I would remove the information (you should have the post in your system). However, the first I learned of any “response” was by finding your derogatory comment on facebook (December 6, 2017).  That was only because I did a search for ShastaDefense. I don’t know where you are sending your e-mails, but my e-mail is set forth above. You could have called me, e-mailed me at the above address, or used the U.S. Mail. But,for some reason you decided to refer to me as a “clown”, encouraging your blog followers to make unprofessional and derogatory remarks (which are continuing).

You have continued to falsely advise persons that you have written me several times me, and that I haven’t responded. Again, no e-mails were received by me, except for your Blog Mailings that you send to subscribers for your articles (for which I unsubscribed today). Moreover I called and left a voice message for you this morning (California Time) and have received no response.

All article references had very clear attribution to your site and you. None were even remotely claimed to be my work.  The most recent had very large print at the top of the article with your link.

They have all been removed. If you see any left, please advise and I will remove.

Contrary to your blog followers, the defense network continues with permission.  They are professional and welcomed my promotion and referral of visitors to their site.

Comments on your blog are demeaning and false.

Nathan Zeliff, Esq.

530-474-3267

  ———-END OF    E-MAILS  ———-
Today, December 6, 2017, I found negative comments on FACE Book from  http://www.activeresponsetraining.net/  as to my  linking and posting of his articles. I only found the negative comments after my making a search.
On December 6, I wrote Active Response Training, after viewing the negative comments, as follows (through his Comments input form, because I couldn’t find a telephone number or other e-mail).-  My webs site is ShastaDefense. I have been posting your articles (excerpts with links to your site).  All were linked directly to your website with full attribution. Recently I posted an entire article and WROTE you via e-mail (this was actually his comment form) asking if that was okay with you. I didn’t receive any response. I viewed your articles as informative and educational.
I have not received any e-mail from you. It was only because I did a search that I found your negative statement. My phone number is 530-474-3267. Please call to discuss. If you desire that I stop linking to your articles I will do so. It would be appreciated if you would speak or communicate with me.”
I only found out about the “problem” by doing a search on face book. I didn’t receive any phone call or e-mail from you. A professional approach would have been to contact me, and not make derogatory comments. Or, you could have responded to my communication to you on this subject.
I viewed the articles and information as being very informative, and important for CCW  holders to learn. However, I am removing links to Active Response Training articles.  I will stop referring persons to your  resource. Your unprofessional comments and false statement about having contacted me diminishes your credibility. I have my direct telephone number on my  my web site and my mailing address. You also have my  direct e-mail address.  You could have simply made contact. The unprofessional comments that you and your followers made  are not justified.
Active Response Training could have merely responded to my recent communication concerning posting of articles (permission request) (beyond partial information posting with a link  to the full article at your site) which I made  before   Response Training made false statements.
December 6, 2017, I located a number for you and called (morning, California time). I left a voice message.  However, I still haven’t received any communication from you on this subject.  The links to your articles have been removed . If you see any left over, please advise and I will remove them also.  I know persons were learning of your site through my links and my classes.
I had recently started printing out a few of your key articles (at my cost, and at no charge to my students). My name wasn’t even on the pages (they were just stapled and handed out  to a few students – e.g., suicide bombers, surviving vehicle attacks). I did this because I felt the content was important so that people would become aware, and maybe save a family from a bomber, etc… . That was all at additional cost to me and the only contact information on the page was YOUR BLOG.  That process has now stopped. My CCW classes seek to instruct students.  I routinely am advised by students that in my 4 hour renewal classes (required under California law), that I cover important matters that were not even addressed by other instructors in their FULL  original 12 hour class.

Does your community have an emergency radio communications plan?

12-5-2017

3rd Southern California wildfire breaks out

CBS News 2 hours 38 minutes ago

LOS ANGELES — A third Southern California wildfire has broken out on the northern edge of Los Angeles, sweeping across 200 acres and forcing the closure of a major stretch of freeway. Los Angeles County Fire Chief Daryl Osby said the fire in Santa Clarita started at about 9:30 a.m. Tuesday. CBS Los Angeles reports that officials named it the Rye Fire. Flames were burning in light to medium fuels amid wind gusts as much as 30 miles per hour, authorities said. The I-5 Freeway was closed in both directions due to the fire, CBS Los Angeles reported. The fire appeared to be linked to a power outage that left the Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff’s Station’s 911 system offline, authorities said. The Sylmar …

Read more

For Shingletown Emergency Radio Plan – See HERE

T op Three Errors Armed Citizens Make in Self Defense

Armed Citizens’Legal Defense Network, Inc. – December 2017 issue.
Article includes discussion of following:
1.  Alcohol and guns
2.  Lying to the police
3.  Your statements to the police
4.  Your call to 911
5.  Excessive use of force / pulling the gun too soon
6.  Firing the gun
7.  The number of shots fired should NOT be an engrained habit
8.  Failure to document training or not being trained to begin with
9.  Pre-Attack indicators – video of Marc MacYoung
10. Tueller Drill
11.  Don’t be a jerk

Read more here Network December, 2017

My Revolver Stopped Revolving

 

Revolvers fail, too. I feel like I’m starting to sound like a broken record at this point, but I’ll probably keep bringing it up until people stop spreading misinformation about revolvers being “100% reliable.” In the video below, I describe yet another revolver failure I recently encountered. Two of them, actually. And I’m not talking about the kind of problems you can fix in a couple of seconds on the firing line. I mean, “put it in a box and mail it to the men with tools” kind of problems.

Details in the video, or scroll down for the full transcript

Read More HERE

Fake Rock IEDs of Various Regions – Be aware

Here is a look at what has been found in several different regions.

Civil Defence members also found an IED disguised as a rock--a design used extensively by both IRGC-backed groups and IS (2)

…Read More HERE

LESSONS FROM SOUTHERLAND SPRINGS

Church shooting 5

When one of these events takes place it is imperative for us to learn from them should we hope to prevent or interdict the next one.  Sadly, this is rarely done to a true operational level.  It may be too soon to do this, but we have had three major events in the last three weeks.  I do not think it is too soon.  These points were brought to the discussion on my forum warriortalk.com by one of its members –

FACT 1:  Shooter visited the site five days prior to the attack.  This was probably a reconnaissance of the site.  We know that both terrorists as well as “crazy people” have done this prior to their initiation of attack.  Alternatively, he may not have decided to attack yet and was working up to it

LEARNING POINT: In today’s tech world ….

FACT 4:  Shooter was wearing body armor (type unknown) and a helmet.  Same situation in many other events.

 

Read More Here